Miranda fricker distinguishes two forms of epistemic injustice. Providers must do no harm and act in the best interests of their patients. There are a number of phenomena that might be brought under the general head of epistemic injustice. Epistemic injustice and illness, coauthored with havi carel, journal of applied philosophy 332 2017. A philosophical analysis, medicine, healthcare and philosophy 174 2014. Fricker adjusts the philosophical lens so that we see through to the negative space that is epistemic injustice.
Ill persons are vulnerable to testimonial injustice through the presumptive attribution. In a recent survey of current trends or fads in academic philosophy, one of the top 5 was the evolving work in epistemic injustice. Questions regarding epistemic injustice in knowledge. For more information, check out the introduction post and the list of upcoming topics. Feminist standpoint theory has done the most to articulate the importance of perspectival differences stemming from social location. According to fricker, there are two kinds of epistemic injustice. List of philosophical publications by havi carel university of bristol, including healthcare practice, epistemic injustice, and naturalism, epistemic injustice and illness, and bernard n. The genesis of this trend started in 2007 when miranda fricker, then a professor in the philosophy department at birkbeck, university of london shook the philosophical world with this book. Argues that distributive epistemic injustice is an important kind of epistemic injustice in its own right, discussing both frickers work on epistemic injustice and alvin goldman s veritistic social epistemology.
Everyday low prices and free delivery on eligible orders. These will be discussed below as a form of hermeneutical injustice, and we have also discussed them elsewhere. Mar 12, 2008 the introduction offers a clear statement of the authors aim. The routledge handbook of epistemic injustice is essential reading for students and researchers in ethics, epistemology, political philosophy, feminist theory, and philosophy. Applying the idea of epistemic injustice to healthcare, carel and kidd suggested that the structures of contemporary healthcare practice encourage epistemic injustice because they privilege certain styles of articulating testimonies, certain forms of evidence, and certain ways of presenting and sharing knowledge carel and kidd, 2014, p.
Testimonial injustice occurs when prejudice causes a hearer to give a deflated level of. The epistemology of resistance paperback jose medina. A philosophical analysis medicine, healthcare and philosophy 17. Apr 17, 2014 read epistemic injustice in healthcare. An exploration of patients experiences of epistemic injustice testimonial and hermeneutical in medical treatment. Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes in philosophy, but in order to reveal the ethical dimension of our epistemic practices the. We detail two types of epistemic injustice, testimonial and hermeneutical, and identify the negative stereotypes and structural features of modern healthcare practices that generate them. Epistemology is the study of the grounds of knowledge. Epistemic injustice anthologies, symposia, and overview. In doing so, it charts the ethical dimension of two fundamental epistemic practices. We end by proposing five avenues for further work on epistemic injustice in healthcare. Adopted from elements of marxist theory, feminist standpoint theory also represents one of the more thorough attempts to ground epistemology and, correspondingly, a view of knowers in a social theory.
In her book epistemic injustice, philosopher miranda fricker argues that there is a distinctively epistemic kind of injustice, which is a wrong done to someone in their capacity as knower. Epistemic injustice philosophy oxford bibliographies. Apart from the fictional example of tom robinson in to kill a mocking bird, miranda fricker makes no explicit reference to the judiciary in this excellent and well argued book. Carel, havi and ian james kidd, epistemic injustice in healthcare. Thus, a concern about epistemic injustice is not merely a narrow medical or bioethical concern, but a broad and pervasive problem that has particular ethical consequences, in terms of suffering, health inequality and medical treatment, when it plays itself out in the healthcare arena for a full discussion of epistemic injustice in healthcare. Epistemic injustice and illness bibliography ian james kidd.
Striking the balance with epistemic injustice in healthcare. Journal of psychosocial rehabilitation and mental health, vol. Given how we normally think about justice in philosophy, the idea of epistemic injustice might. Ill persons can suffer testimonial injustice through the presumptive attribution of characteristics like cognitive. A philosophical analysis havi carel ian james kidd department of philosophy. I can imagine a case wherein someone who has a credibility excess is targeted for dismissive incomprehension in order to reduce their inflated credibility to a fair level. Lastly, i present an analysis of virtue epistemology, and construct a virtue of epistemic justice that is richer than frickers, as a measure to combat epistemic injustice in the context of healthcare in south africa. Frickers concept of epistemic injustice is used as a lens to investigate how this type of advocacy might mitigate forms of epistemic injustice, and thereby promote greater social justice in mental health. Such epistemic injustices assume particular force within healthcare contexts. We offer an epistemic analysis of this problem using miranda frickers account of epistemic injustice.
Healthcare practice, epistemic injustice, and naturalism volume 84 ian. Aug 01, 2009 epistemic injustice explores the idea that there is a distinctively epistemic kind of injustice injustice which consists in a wrong done to someone specifically in their capacity as a knower. Carel, havi and kidd, ian 2014 epistemic injustice in healthcare. The chapter argues that epistemic injustice arises in part owing to the epistemic privilege enjoyed by the practitioners and institutions of contemporary healthcare servicesthe former owing to their training, expertise, and thirdperson psychology, and the latter owing to their implicit privileging of certain styles of articulating and. In epistemic injustice miranda fricker argues that there is a distinctively epistemic type of injustice in which someone is wronged specifically in his or her capacity as a knower. This book offers a new theory of social insensitivity, a new kind of interactionism and contextualism, and a new account of solidarity and activism through the notion of chained agency. Apr 17, 2014 in this paper we argue that ill persons are particularly vulnerable to epistemic injustice in the sense articulated by fricker epistemic injustice. It will also be very useful for those in related fields, such as cultural studies, sociology, education and law. The book explores two different types of epistemic injustice. Epistemic injustice paperback miranda fricker oxford. Epistemic injustice and illness kidd journal of applied philosophy. The first of these concepts is explained through a critique of alvin goldmans veritistic social epistemology. Epistemic injustice paperback miranda fricker oxford university.
This book explores the idea that there is a distinctively epistemic kind of injustice. Epistemic injustice one of the most important and groundbreaking subjects to have emerged in philosophy in recent years refers to those forms of unfair treatment that relate to issues of knowledge, understanding, and participation in communicative. A philosophical analysis of womens reproductive health care in a somaliamerican community. The routledge handbook of epistemic injustice routledge. The legitimacy of user knowledge in decisionmaking processes in mental health care. Ill persons are vulnerable to testimonial injustice through the presumptive attribution of characteristics such as cognitive unreliability and emotional instability that downgrade the credibility of their testimonies. As a result, epistemic injustice makes a significant contribution. Kidd, ian james, epistemic injustice in healthcare. Epistemic injustice in healthcare oxford scholarship. In this exploratory paper, i consider how intellectual humility and epistemic injustice might contribute to the failure of testimonial exchanges. A philosophical analysis havi carel ian james kidd department of philosophy department of philosophy university of bristol durham university forthcoming in medicine, healthcare, and philosophy abstract in this paper we argue that ill persons are particularly. We then argue that epistemic injustice arises in part owing to the epistemic privilege enjoyed by the practitioners and institutions of contemporary healthcare servicesthe former owing to their training, expertise, and thirdperson psychology, and the latter owing to their implicit privileging of certain styles of articulating and evidencing testimonies in ways that marginalise ill persons. In the era of information and communication, issues of misinformation and miscommunication are more pressing than ever. A philosophical analysis article pdf available in medicine health care and philosophy 174 april 2014 with 1,3 reads how we measure reads.
Epistemic injustice and illness ian james kidd philosopher. In this paper we argue that ill persons can experience epistemic injustice in the sense articulated by miranda fricker 2007. In 1, i will briefly highlight four broad ways a testimonial exchange might fail. The routledge handbook of epistemic injustice 1st edition. This chapter argues that ill persons are particularly vulnerable to epistemic injustice in the sense articulated by miranda fricker. Healthcare practice, epistemic injustice, and naturalism royal. Ill persons can suffer testimonial injustice through the presumptive attribution of characteristics like cognitive unreliability and emotional instability that. The epistemology of resistance gender and racial oppression, epistemic injustice, and resistant imaginations jose medina studies in feminist philosophy. In this paper we argue that ill persons are particularly vulnerable to epistemic injustice in the sense articulated by fricker epistemic injustice. Lastly, i present an analysis of virtue epistemology, and construct a virtue of epistemic justice that is richer than fricker. Also included are chapters on areas in applied ethics and philosophy, such as law, education, and healthcare. Ian james kidd philosopher philosophy of illness and. Benefit and harm are canonical principles in bioethics. A philosophical analysis, medicine, healthcare, and philosophy 17,4 2014.
Epistemic injustice in psychiatry bjpsych bulletin. The second is closely based on miranda frickers concept of epistemic injustice. Final authors draft, please refer to print edition epistemic injustice in healthcare. We then argue that epistemic injustice arises in part owing to the epistemic privilege enjoyed by the practitioners and institutions of contemporary healthcare servicesthe former owing to their training, expertise, and thirdperson psychology, and the latter owing to their. I think in 1 you correctly identify why joe doesnt have a reasonable claim to epistemic injustice. Epistemic injustice in healthcare university of bristol. We then argue that epistemic injustice arises in part owing to the epistemic privilege enjoyed by the practitioners and institutions of contemporary healthcare servicesthe former owing to their training, expertise, and thirdperson psychology, and the latter owing to their implicit privileging of certain styles of articulating and evidencing. Although we have experienced epistemic injustice either in the role of acting it against others, or in the role of suffering because others act epistemic injustice against us, only miranda fricker could see this important issue so clearly and i am really grateful to her for bringing in the open her thoughts on actually everyday observation which just passes. Jul 05, 2007 in a recent survey of current trends or fads in academic philosophy, one of the top 5 was the evolving work in epistemic injustice.
The book reveals epistemic injustice as a potent yet largely silent dimension of discrimination, analyses the wrong it perpetrates, and constructs two hybrid ethicalintellectual virtues of. The routledge handbook of epistemic injustice is essential reading for students and researchers in ethics, epistemology, political philosophy, feminist theory, and philosophy of race. Epistemic injustice is unfairness related to knowledge. A paper on the social epistemology of healthcare for a volume on personcentred healthcare to be edited by michael oloughlin.
By examining the way injustice can occur to individuals when they are. Healthcare practice, epistemic injustice, and naturalism. A philosophical analysis, forthcoming medicine, healthcare, and philosophy. Epistemic injustice and illness kidd 2017 journal of. Epistemic injustice is one of the most important and groundbreaking subjects to have emerged in philosophy in recent years. A philosophical analysis, coauthored with havi carel, medicine, healthcare, and philosophy 17.
The book explores two different types of epistemic injustice, each driven by a form of prejudice, and from this exploration comes a positive account of two corrective ethicalintellectual virtues. The book draws on diverse philosophical materialschiefly, the. The routledge handbook of epistemic injustice book, 2017. The charge of epistemic injustice can be analysed in terms of the two specific forms which fricker identifies. In particular, the book constitutes a striking example of how contemporary epistemology can be enriched by a close attention to our experiences, and of how our understanding of epistemic matters can be deepened through the deployment of ideas from ethics, plitical theory and feminist philosophy. As the account unfolds, the book travels through a range of philosophical problems. The concept of epistemic injustice provides a valuable theoretical basis for understanding the worth of advocacy in addressing testimonial. Testimonial injustice occurs when prejudice causes a hearer to unfairly assign a lower level of credibility to a speakers. The first theory of epistemic injustice was introduced in 2007 by british philosopher miranda fricker, who coined the term. Fricker adjusts the philosophical lens so that we see through to the negative space thatis epistemic injustice. Moreover, the book is beautifully written martin kusch, mind in this elegantly crafted book, miranda frickers timely project of looking at the negative space that is epistemic injustice.
In this exploration of new territory between ethics and epistemology, miranda fricker argues that there is a distinctively epistemic type of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower. The case of chronic fatigue syndromemyalgic encephalomyelitis. Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes in philosophy, but in order to reveal the ethical dimension of our epistemic practices the focus must shift to injustice. Feb 08, 2017 buy the routledge handbook of epistemic injustice routledge handbooks in philosophy 1 by kidd, ian james, medina, jose, pohlhaus jr. We then argue that epistemic injustice arises in part owing to the epistemic privilege enjoyed by the practitioners and institutions of contemporary healthcare servicesthe former owing to their training, expertise, and thirdperson psychology, and the latter owing to their implicit. One might suggest that the second justification for a conceptual distinction between testimonial injustice and dismissive incomprehension is good, once modified, as there may well be fair instances of dismissive incomprehension. We offer an epistemic analysis of this problem using miranda. But at least parts of it should be required reading for those involved with any system a central plank of which is the evaluation of testimony. In this paper we argue that ill persons are particularly vulnerable to epistemic injustice in the sense articulated by miranda fricker 2007. Sep 28, 2009 epistemic injustice explores the idea that there is a distinctively epistemic kind of injustice injustice which consists in a wrong done to someone specifically in their capacity as a knower. Frickers examples of identityprejudicial credibility deficit primarily involve gender, race, and class, in which individuals are given less credibility due to prejudicial stereotypes. I then consider the recent life esidimeni tragedy in south african mental healthcare in the context of these kinds of injustice. Pdf in this paper we argue that ill persons are particularly vulnerable to epistemic injustice in the sense articulated by fricker epistemic.
The book identifies two forms of epistemic injustice. Mar 31, 2017 the routledge handbook of epistemic injustice is essential reading for students and researchers in ethics, epistemology, political philosophy, feminist theory, and philosophy of race. Fricker, miranda 2012 silence and institutional prejudice, in sharon crasnow and anita superson eds. What philosophy is, coedited with david gamez london continuum, 2004 selected journal articles and book chapters healthcare practice, epistemic injustice, and naturalism, with ian james kidd, in s barker, c crerar, and t goetz eds. Selected journal articles and book chapters healthcare practice, epistemic injustice, and naturalism, with ian james kidd, in s barker, c crerar, and t goetz eds. The term epistemic injustice was introduced to the literature in the monograph of that name, epistemic injustice. In her book, fricker focuses on epistemic injustices that arise from. Ill persons can suffer testimonial injustice through the presumptive attribution of characteristics like. Two concepts of epistemic injustice episteme cambridge core.
200 81 1417 873 3 464 703 367 452 538 581 1433 599 359 449 1098 61 545 1202 466 862 1061 1546 1250 1601 872 352 152 114 163 1615 1670 1185 1639 1620 1187 200 1355 245 1431 235 1278 7 170 1218 1378